Performance Analysis of Parameters for UWSN (Underwater Wireless Sensor Network)

Authors

  • Ravindra Dhongadi
  • S. M. Hirikude
  • S. J. Thikane

Keywords:

Autonomous underwater vehicle networks (AUVNs), Expected transmission count (ETX), False positive rate (FPR), True positive rate (TPR), Underwater wireless sensor networks (UWSNs)

Abstract

The potential of underwater wireless sensor networks (UWSNs) for practical uses, including oil monitoring, deep sea archaeology, marine surveillance, and sea monitoring, is making them more and more popular among researchers. Since water covers about 70% of the Earth’s surface, it is difficult for people to extract useful information from the seafloor without the use of sophisticated equipment. Sensor nodes are positioned to sense the underwater environment in UWSNs. The data gathered is subsequently transmitted to a sink node, which forwards it to a base station for processing. Sensor node deployment in UWSNs is challenging because of the challenging underwater environment, and data routing is made more challenging by the nodes' high energy consumption and short communication range. Malicious nodes can use a variety of techniques, such as wormhole, black hole, and sybil attacks, to compromise UWSNs. The focus of lightweight cryptography is on algorithms that utilise less memory, computing power, and energy, which makes them appropriate for devices with limited resources, such as mobile phones, sensors, and Internet of Things devices. In lightweight cryptography, the chaotic system known as the Hénon map is occasionally employed, especially for text/image encryption. For devices with limited computing power, it can be used to create random sequences for encryption techniques' permutation and diffusion, providing a balance between security and resource efficiency.

References

R. J. Taher and K. K. Mohsen, “Underwater wireless sensor networks (review),” BIO Web of Conferences, vol. 97, 2024/

K. Saeed et al., “A comprehensive analysis of security-based schemes in underwater wireless sensor networks,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 9, Apr. 2023.

S. Shah et al., “Enhancing security and efficiency in underwater wireless sensor networks: A lightweight key management framework,” Symmetry, vol. 15, no. 8, Jul. 2023.

F. Demim, R. Bouguessa, A. Rouigueb, and A. Nemra, “A systematic overview of underwater wireless sensor networks: Applications, challenge and research perspectives,” Journal of Computer Science Research, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 52–77, Apr. 2023.

M. Garg, S. Sharma, V. Balu, D. K. Sinha, P. Bhatt, and A. K. Bhagat, “Underwater acoustic sensor network data optimization with enhanced void avoidance and routing protocol,” International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security (IJCNIS), vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 150–162, Dec. 2022.

S. B. Goyal, R. V. Ravi, C. Verma, M. S. Raboaca, and F. M. Enescu, “A lightweight cryptographic algorithm for underwater acoustic networks,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 215, pp. 266–273, 2022.

G. Ateniese, A. Capossele, P. Gjanci, C. Petrioli and D. Spaccini, “SecFUN: Security framework for underwater acoustic sensor networks,” OCEANS 2015 - Genova, Genova, Italy, 2015, pp. 1–9.

G. Dini and A. Lo Duca, “A secure communication suite for underwater acoustic sensor networks,” Sensors, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 15133–15158, Nov. 2012.

C. M. G. Gussen, P. S. R. Diniz, M. L. R. Campos, W. A. Martins, F. M. Costa, and J. N. Gois, “A survey of underwater wireless communication technologies,” Journal of Communication and Information Systems, vol. 31, no. 1, Oct. 2016.

A. Alharbi, and M. Muzzammil, “A survey on the security of routing protocols for underwater acoustic sensor networks,” IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 453–464, Jan. 2022.

Z. U. Rehman, S. Altaf and S. Iqbal, “An efficient lightweight key agreement and authentication scheme for WBAN,” in IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 175385–175397, 2020.

B. Mishachandar and S Vairamuthu, “A review on underwater acoustic sensor networks: Perspective of Internet of Things,” International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1603–1615, Apr. 2019.

S. Sweta, and B. Maram, “Underwater wireless sensor networks,” International Journal on Informatics Visualization, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 10–12, 2018.

Published

2026-04-01

How to Cite

Ravindra Dhongadi, S. M. Hirikude, & S. J. Thikane. (2026). Performance Analysis of Parameters for UWSN (Underwater Wireless Sensor Network). Advance Research in Communication Engineering and Its Innovations, 42–51. Retrieved from https://matjournals.net/engineering/index.php/ARCEI/article/view/3340