AI-Powered Content Moderation
Keywords:
AI, Censorship, Content moderation, Computer vision, Ethics, Misinformation, NLPAbstract
With the rapid expansion of digital platforms, content moderation has become a critical challenge. The increasing volume of user-generated content has led to the adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-powered moderation systems to detect and remove harmful material, including hate speech, misinformation, explicit content, and cyber threats. AI techniques such as Natural Language Processing (NLP), computer vision, and deep learning enable automated detection of harmful content with high efficiency and scalability. However, these systems face several challenges, including bias in AI models, false positives and negatives, cultural and linguistic variations, and adversarial tactics used to evade detection. Additionally, the ethical and legal implications of AI moderation raise concerns about censorship, privacy, and accountability. This paper explores the current state of AI-powered content moderation, evaluating its strengths, limitations, and ethical considerations. It also discusses hybrid approaches, where AI works alongside human moderators to improve accuracy and fairness. Lastly, we examine future advancements, such as explainable AI (XAI), improved multilingual models, and decentralized moderation frameworks. AI-driven moderation is shaping the future of digital safety, but achieving transparency, fairness, and effectiveness remains a complex challenge requiring continued innovation and regulatory oversight.
References
T. Gillespie, Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. Yale University Press, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300235029 .
H. Hosseini, S. Kannan, B. Zhang, and R. Poovendran, “Deceiving Google’s Perspective API Built for Detecting Toxic Comments,” Arxiv: 1702.08138 [cs], Feb. 2017, Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08138
A. Schmidt and M. Wiegand, “A Survey on Hate Speech Detection using Natural Language Processing,” ACLWeb, Apr. 01, 2017. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W17-1101
J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, “BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding,” Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North, vol. 1, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/n19-1423.
B. Vidgen, A. Harris, D. Nguyen, R. Trouble, S. Hale, and H. Margetts, “Challenges and frontiers in abusive content detection,” Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Abusive Language Online, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w19-3509.
R. Denton, B. Hutchinson, M. Mitchell, T. Gebru, and A. Zaldivar, “Image Counterfactual Sensitivity Analysis for Detecting Unintended Bias,” arXiv.org, 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.06439 (accessed Mar. 04, 2025).
J. Buolamwini and I. D. Raji, “Actionable Auditing: Investigating the Impact of Publicly Naming Biased Performance Results of Commercial AI Products,” dspace.mit.edu, 2019, Available: https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/123456
K. Wang, Z. Fu, L. Zhou, and Y. Zhu, “Content Moderation in Social Media: The Characteristics, Degree, and Efficiency of User Engagement,” 2022 3rd Asia Symposium on Signal Processing (ASSP), Dec. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/assp57481.2022.00022 .
N. Mehrabi, F. Morstatter, N. Saxena, K. Lerman, and A. Galstyan, “A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1–35, Jul. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3457607.
K. Crawford and T. Paglen, “Excavating AI: the politics of images in machine learning training sets,” AI & SOCIETY, vol. 36, pp. 1105–1116, Jun. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01162-8.
K. Shu, A. Sliva, S. Wang, J. Tang, and H. Liu, “Fake news detection on social media: A data mining perspective,” ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 22–36, Sep. 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3137597.3137600.
E. Bender, A. McMillan-Major, S. Shmitchell, and T. Gebru, “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? ,” FAccT ’21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 610–623, Mar. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922.
T. B. Brown et al., “Language Models Are Few-Shot Learners,” arxiv.org, vol. 4, May 2020, Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165
K. Ananthajothi, R. Meenakshi, and S. Monica, “Promoting Positive Discourse: Advancing AI-Powered Content Moderation with Explain ability and User Rephrasing,” 2024 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication and Applied Informatics, May 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/accai61061.2024.10601796.
H. Saleous, M. Gergely, and K. Shuaib, “Utilization of Artificial Intelligence for Social Media and Gaming Moderation,” 2023 15th International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology, Nov. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/iit59782.2023.10366468.
B. Rőczey and S. Szénási, “Automated Moderation Helper System Using Artificial Intelligence Based Text Classification and Recommender System Techniques,” 2023 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI), pp. 000477–000482, May 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/saci58269.2023.10158593.
G. Gosztonyi, D. Gyetván, and A. Kovács, “Theory and Practice of Social Media’s Content Moderation by Artificial Intelligence in Light of European Union’s AI Act and Digital Services Act,” European Journal of Law and Political Science, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 33–42, Feb. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.24018/ejpolitics.2025.4.1.165
R. Dimitrova, “Artificial Intelligence in Content Moderation – Legal Challenges and EU Legal Framework,” IEEE Xplore, May 01, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMSCI55378.2022.9912595 (accessed Nov. 19, 2022).
