Power Optimization in VLSI Design and Testing: A Concise Survey
Keywords:
BIST, CUT, Leakage power, LFSR, Power aware testing, Scan cell, SoC, Test vectorAbstract
Rapid advancements in semiconductor technology and aggressive CMOS scaling have made power dissipation one of the most critical challenges in contemporary Very Large-Scale Integration (VLSI) design and testing. As transistor dimensions shrink and circuit density increases, both dynamic and leakage power components significantly influence system reliability, performance, thermal stability, and device lifetime. In particular, power consumption during testing has emerged as a serious concern, as test mode operation often induces substantially higher switching activity than normal functional mode, leading to excessive peak and average power dissipation. This survey presents a comprehensive and systematic review of power optimization techniques employed across VLSI design and test domains, with emphasis on their effectiveness, limitations, and trade-offs. The paper begins by examining the fundamental sources of power dissipation in CMOS circuits, categorizing them into dynamic and static (leakage) power components. Dynamic power is primarily associated with switching activity, capacitive charging and discharging, short-circuit currents, and glitches, while leakage power arises from subthreshold conduction, gate oxide leakage, reverse-biased junction leakage, and other nanoscale effects. With continued technology scaling below deep submicron nodes, leakage power has become comparable to, and in some cases dominant over, dynamic power, particularly during standby and test operations. The influence of threshold voltage reduction, temperature rise, and pattern dependency on leakage behaviour is also highlighted. A detailed review of low-power VLSI design methodologies is presented, encompassing both dynamic and static power reduction strategies. Dynamic power optimization techniques such as device scaling, voltage scaling, transistor sizing, transistor reordering, and precomputation are discussed in terms of their impact on switching activity, delay, and overall performance. Static power reduction techniques, including power gating with sleep transistors, forced transistor stacking, sleepy stack, LECTOR, GALEOR, sleepy keeper, and drain gating approaches, are analyzed for their ability to suppress leakage currents during idle or standby modes. The survey emphasizes that while these techniques can achieve significant leakage reduction, they often introduce design overheads in terms of area, delay, and control complexity. In addition to design-time techniques, the paper extensively reviews power-aware testing methodologies, particularly those related to scan-based testing and Built-In Self-Test (BIST) architectures. Techniques such as scan cell reordering, X-filling strategies, test vector compression and ordering, scan architecture modification, scan clock splitting, and switching activity minimization are examined for their role in reducing average and peak test power. Furthermore, low-power BIST techniques utilizing modified Linear Feedback Shift Registers (LFSRs), dual-speed LFSRs, vector filtering, and test data compression are discussed as effective solutions for minimizing transition density while maintaining acceptable fault coverage. The survey underscores that no single technique is sufficient to address the power challenges posed by modern VLSI systems. Instead, an integrated approach that combines design-time power optimization with test-time power-aware strategies is essential to achieve meaningful reductions in overall power dissipation. The paper also highlights emerging research directions, particularly the growing importance of runtime leakage power and test vector dependency in nanoscale technologies. By consolidating a wide range of established and recent techniques, this work serves as a valuable reference for researchers and designers aiming to develop energy-efficient, reliable, and scalable VLSI systems.
References
S. Wang, “A BIST TPG for Low Power Dissipation and High Fault Coverage,” IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 777–789, Jul. 2007
M. C. Bushnell and V. D. Agrawal, Essentials of Electronic Testing for Digital, Memory and Mixed-Signal VLSI Circuits. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
C. Shi and R. Kapur, “How power-aware test improves reliability and yield,” EE Times, Sep. 16, 2004.
J. K. Saxena et al., “A case study of ir-drop in structured at-speed testing,” International Test Conference, Sep. 2003
K. Roy, S. Mukhopadhyay, and H. Mahmoodi-Meimand, “Leakage current mechanisms and leakage reduction techniques in deep-submicrometer CMOS circuits,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 305–327, Feb. 2003.
S. G. Reddy and R. prasad, “Power comparison of CMOS and adiabatic full adder circuit,” International Journal of VLSI Design & Communication Systems, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 75–86, Sep. 2011.
A., Agarwal and S. Mukhopadhyay, “Leakage Power Analysis and Reduction for Nanoscale Circuits,” IEEE Micro, 2026.
K. K. Kim, M. Choi, and N. Park, “Leakage Minimization Technique for Nanoscale CMOS VLSI,” IEEE Design & Test of Computers, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 322–330, Apr. 2007
F. Fallah and M. Pedram, “Standby and Active Leakage Current Control and Minimization in CMOS VLSI Circuits.”
M. D. Singh, “Leakage power reduction techniques of 45 nm static random access memory (SRAM) cells,” International Journal of the Physical Sciences, vol. 6, no. 32, Dec. 2011
J. Deshmukh and K. Khare, “Standby leakage reduction in nanoscale CMOS VLSI circuits,” ICWET ’10: Proceedings of the International Conference and Workshop on Emerging Trends in Technology, Feb. 2010
S. Borkar, “Design challenges of technology scaling,” IEEE Micro, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 23–29, 1999
P. Feldmann and F. Liu, “Sparse and efficient reduced order modeling of linear subcircuits with a large number of terminals,” IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer Aided Design, 2004. ICCAD-2004, Feb. 2005
W. Hung, Y. Xie, N. Vijaykrishnan, M. J. Irwin, and Y. Tsai, “Total power optimization through simultaneously multiple-v DD multiple-v TH assignment and device sizing with stack forcing,” ISLPED ’04: Proceedings of the 2004 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design, Aug. 2004
J. Rabaey, A. Chandrakasan, and B. Nikolic, “Digital Integrated Circuits: A Design Perspective, 2nd Edition,” 1999.
T. Ishihara and H. Yasuura, “Voltage scheduling problem for dynamically variable voltage processors,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design (ISLPED), Aug. 1998, pp. 197–202.
P. Pillai and K. G. Shin, “Real-time dynamic voltage scaling for low-power embedded operating systems,” in Proceedings of the 18th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP), 2001.
F. Yao, A. Demers, and S. Shenker, “A scheduling model for reduced CPU energy,” in Proceedings of the 36th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 1995, pp. 374–382.
S. Irani, S. Shukla, and R. Gupta, “Algorithms for power savings,” in Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 2003.
S. Ghosh, S. Basu, and N. A. Touba, “Joint minimization of power and area in scan testing by scan cell reordering,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI, Feb. 2003, pp. 246–249.
S. Sharifi, J. Jaffari, M. Hosseinabady, A. Afzali-Kusha, and Z. Navabi, “Simultaneous reduction of dynamic and static power in scan structures,” in Proceedings of the Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition (DATE), 2005, pp. 1530–1591.
P. Girard, X. Wen, and N. A. Touba, “Low-power testing,” in System-on-Chip Test Architectures: Nanometer Design for Testability. Burlington, MA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2007, pp. 207–350.
S. Wang and W. Wei, “A technique to reduce peak current and average power dissipation in scan designs by limited capture,” in Proceedings of the Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC), Jan. 2007, pp. 810–816.
L. Whetsel, “Adapting scan architectures for low power operation,” in Proceedings of the International Test Conference (ITC), Oct. 2000, pp. 863–872.
Y. Bonhomme, P. Girard, L. Guiller, C. Landrault, and S. Pravossoudovitch, “A gated clock scheme for low power scan testing of logic ICs or embedded cores,” in Proceedings of the Asian Test Symposium (ATS), Nov. 2001, pp. 253–258.
S. Wang and S. K. Gupta, “ATPG for heat dissipation minimization for scan testing,” in Proceedings of the Design Automation Conference (DAC), Jun. 1997, pp. 614–619.
S. Wang and S. K. Gupta, “LT-RTPG: A new test-per-scan BIST TPG for low heat dissipation,” in Proceedings of the International Test Conference (ITC), Sep. 1999, pp. 85–94.
P. Girard, L. Guiller, C. Landrault, and S. Pravossoudovitch, “A test vector inhibiting technique for low energy BIST design,” in Proceedings of the IEEE VLSI Test Symposium, Apr. 1999, pp. 407–412.
R. Sankaralingam, R. Oruganti, and N. A. Touba, “Static compaction techniques to control scan vector power dissipation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE VLSI Test Symposium, May 2000, pp. 35–42.
L. T. Wang, C. W. Wu, and X. Wen, VLSI Test Principles and Architectures: Design for Testability. Burlington, MA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2006, pp. 56–65.
V. Singh, S. K. Arya, and M. Kumar, “Different perspectives of low power design for CMOS VLSI circuit,” International Journal of Electronics Engineering, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 604–613, Jun.–Dec. 2018.
M. Philippe and S. Mariem, “Multiple threshold voltage for glitch power reduction,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Faible Tension Faible Consommation Conference (FTFC), 2011, pp. 67–70.
R. Kumar, M. Madhupriya, and S. Subashchand, “A survey on low power VLSI design,” International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, vol. 2, Special Issue 1, 2015.
S. Chaudhari, I. Jadhav, H. V. Dhande, A. D. Vishwakarma, and S.-U.-R. Ansari, “Low power VLSI design – A literature survey,” International Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Science, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 16–21, 2025.
R. Gullapally, N. S. S. Reddy, and P. C. Sekhar, “Design and analysis of low power VLSI based SRAM cell using CMOS, FinFET and GNRFET technology,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, vol. 3, no. 3, 2023.