Brain Signal Security and Ethical Considerations in ML/DL-based BCIs

Authors

  • R. Naveenkumar
  • Rubi Sarkar
  • Nitin Kumar

Keywords:

Adversarial attacks, Brain–computer interfaces, Brain signal security, Data privacy, Data protection, Deep learning, Ethical considerations, Informed consent, Machine learning, Neuroethics

Abstract

Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL)-based Brain–Computer Interfaces (BCIs) have dramatically transformed human-technology interaction, enabling applications that range from assistive technologies to neurorehabilitation. The application of ML/DL-based BCIs brings serious concerns related to brain signal security and ethics. These are brain signals; hence, by nature, electroencephalography (EEG) and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) can reveal personal information regarding an individual’s mental state, intentions, and health. Therefore, unauthorized access, manipulation, or misuse of such data poses serious risks, such as privacy breaches, identity theft, and malicious control over neuroprosthetics. This paper investigates a set of critical security vulnerabilities in ML/DL-based BCIs, adversarial attacks, data poisoning, and model inversion, which may simultaneously violate the integrity and confidentiality of the brain data. If this is so, then ethical considerations include informed consent, ownership of data, and fair access to BCI technologies. The paper argues for incorporating robust encryption methods, secure data transmission protocols, and adversarial training of BCIs to protect against emerging threats. It also outlines an ethical compliance framework that focuses on transparency, accountability, and adherence to human rights principles. In this context, the challenges presented above must be addressed as BCI technology is translated from the research environment into widespread application to ensure safe, fair, and trustworthy integration into society. This work seeks to stimulate debate among researchers, practitioners, and policymakers in pushing for interdisciplinary approaches to balance innovation with the demands of ethics and security in this transformative technology.

References

Akitra, “Cybersecurity for brain–computer interfaces: Protecting neural data,” Akitra, Feb. 02, 2025, Available: https://akitra.com/cybersecurity-for-brain-computer-interfaces/

A. L. Omotade, “Neurotechnology and Human-Machine Interfaces: Securing Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) Against Hacking,” World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 2761–2771, Jul. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.27.1.2534

T. Schroder, R. Sirbu, S. Park, J. Morley, S. Street, and L. Floridi, “Cyber risks to next-gen brain-computer interfaces: Analysis and recommendations,” Neuroethics, vol. 18, no. 2, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-025-09607-3

D. Krizs, “Threats of thoughts: The cybersecurity vulnerabilities of brain–computer interfaces,” Black Cell, Aug. 12, 2025, Available: https://blackcell.io/threats-of-thoughts-the-cybersecurity-vulnerabilities-of-brain-computer-interfaces/

T. Denning, Y. Matsuoka, and T. Kohno, “Neurosecurity: Security and privacy for neural devices,” Neurosurgical Focus, vol. 27, no. 1, p. E7, 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.4.focus0985

A. B. Schwartz, X. T. Cui, D. J. Weber, and D. W. Moran, “Brain-controlled interfaces: Movement restoration with neural prosthetics,” Neuron, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 205–220, Oct. 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.019

M. Conti, L. V. Mancini, R. Spolaor, and N. V. Verde, “Can’t you hear me knocking: Identification of user actions on android apps via traffic analysis,” in Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, Mar. 2015, pp. 297–304. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2699026.2699119

J. Chuang, H. Nguyen, C. Wang, and B. Johnson, “I think, therefore I am: Usability and security of authentication using brainwaves,” in Financial Cryptography and Data Security, Berlin: Springer Nature, 2013, pp. 1–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41320-9_1

A. Rajagopal, A. C. Nguyen, and D. M. Briggs, “NeuroPass: A secure neural password based on EEG,” Biomedical Engineering, pp. 1–5, 2013, Available: https://abhe.net/gallery/rajagopal2013_NeuroPass.pdf

G. Senthilkumar, R. Naveenkumar, S. Rajeshkannan, and S. R. Sree, “Efficient energy management in wireless sensor networks based on optimized explicit feature interaction-aware graph neural network,” Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, vol. 18, Mar. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-025-01927-8

R. Kolikipogu et al., “Improving food safety by IoT-based climate monitoring and control systems for food processing plants,” Remote Sensing in Earth Systems Sciences, vol. 8, pp. 387–399, Jan. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41976-024-00190-4

S. M. Padmaja et al., “Deep learning in remote sensing for climate-induced disaster resilience: A comprehensive interdisciplinary approach,” Remote Sensing in Earth Systems Sciences, vol. 8, pp. 145–160, Dec. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41976-024-00178-0

R. N. Kumar and M. A. Kumar, “Enhanced fuzzy K-NN approach for handling missing values in medical data mining,” Indian Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 9, no. S1, pp. 1–7, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9is1/94094

Published

2025-11-06

How to Cite

R. Naveenkumar, Rubi Sarkar, & Nitin Kumar. (2025). Brain Signal Security and Ethical Considerations in ML/DL-based BCIs. Journal of Network Security Computer Networks, 11(3), 26–36. Retrieved from https://matjournals.net/engineering/index.php/JONSCN/article/view/2637

Issue

Section

Articles