Quantum Circuits for Deep Neural Networks: Potential, Pitfalls, and Progress

Authors

  • D. Sri Varshini Undergraduate Student, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Pragati Engineering College (A), Surampalem, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • S. Geetha Undergraduate Student, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Pragati Engineering College (A), Surampalem, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Chandra Sekhar Koppireddy Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Pragati Engineering College (A), Surampalem, Andhra Pradesh, India

Keywords:

Data encoding, Deep learning, NISQ devices, Quantum AI, Quantum computing, Quantum machine learning, Quantum optimization

Abstract

The conjunction of deep learning and quantum computing marks a turning point in the history of intelligent systems. Deep learning has transformed Artificial Intelligence (AI) by enabling machines to learn sophisticated representations from large datasets, greatly impacting image recognition, natural language processing, and autonomous systems. However, training deep neural networks requires immense computational power, often limited by traditional hardware constraints. Quantum computing, which relies on superposition, entanglement, and quantum parallelism, offers a new paradigm that could overcome some of these computational limitations. This chapter explores the rapidly evolving intersection of deep learning and quantum computing, known as Quantum Deep Learning (QDL) or Quantum Machine Learning (QML). We begin by introducing fundamental concepts from both fields, followed by a comprehensive overview of cutting-edge quantum-enhanced learning methods, such as quantum neural networks, variational quantum circuits, and hybrid quantum-classical architectures. Particular focus is given to how quantum algorithms might accelerate deep learning processes, improve model generalization, and enable new forms of learning representations for quantum data. Despite these promising prospects, significant challenges remain. Current quantum hardware, mostly in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) stage, suffers from qubit decoherence, gate noise, and limited scalability. Moreover, encoding classical information into quantum states and optimizing parameterized quantum circuits are complex tasks. This chapter examines these challenges and discusses the theoretical and practical hurdles that must be overcome to realize practical quantum advantage in deep learning. It concludes with open research questions, potential application areas, and a future research roadmap at this exciting interdisciplinary frontier.

References

F. Arute, K. Arya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, “Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor,” Nature, vol. 574, no. 7779, pp. 505–510, Oct. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5.

J. Biamonte, P. Wittek, N. Pancotti, P. Rebentrost, N. Wiebe, and S. Lloyd, “Quantum machine learning,” Nature, vol. 549, no. 7671, pp. 195–202, Sep. 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23474.

M. Schuld, I. Sinayskiy, and F. Petruccione, “An introduction to quantum machine learning,” Contemporary Physics, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 172–185, Oct. 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00107514.2014.964942.

M. Benedetti, E. Lloyd, S. Sack, and M. Fiorentini, “Parameterized quantum circuits as machine learning models,” Quantum Science and Technology, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 043001, Nov. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ab4eb5.

J. R. McClean, S. Boixo, V. N. Smelyanskiy, R. Babbush, and H. Neven, “Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes,” Nature Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, Nov. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07090-4.

V. Havlícek, “Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces,” Nature, vol. 567, pp. 209–212, Mar. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0980-2.

J. Preskill, “Quantum Computing in the NISQ Era and beyond,” Quantum, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 79, Aug. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79.

M. K, M. Negoro, M. Kitagawa, and K. Fujii, “Quantum circuit learning,” Physical Review, vol. 98, no. 3, Sep. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.98.032309.

E. Farhi and H. Neven, “Classification with Quantum Neural Networks on Near Term Processors,” arXiv:1802.06002, Aug. 2018, Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.06002

M. Schuld, A. Bocharov, K. M. Svore, and N. Wiebe, “Circuit-centric quantum classifiers,” Physical Review A, vol. 101, no. 3, Mar. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.101.032308.

K. Beer, D. Bondarenko, T. Farrelly, “Training deep quantum neural networks,” Nature Communications, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 808, Feb. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14454-2.

A. Perdomo-Ortiz, M. Benedetti, J. Realpe-Gómez, and R. Biswas, “Opportunities and challenges for quantum-assisted machine learning in near-term quantum computers,” Quantum Science and Technology, vol. 3, no. 3, p. 030502, Jun. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/aab859.

M. Cerezo, A. Arrasmith, R. Babbush, “Variational quantum algorithms,” Nature Reviews Physics, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 625–644, Sep. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00348-9.

V. Dunjko and H. J. Briegel, “Machine learning & artificial intelligence in the quantum domain: a review of recent progress,” Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 81, no. 7, p. 074001, Jun. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aab406.

IBM Quantum, “Qiskit Machine Learning overview — Qiskit Machine Learning 0.4.0 documentation,” Qiskit.Org. https://Qiskit.Org/Documentation/Machine-Learning/

Published

2025-09-11

Issue

Section

Articles