Multi-Agent Clinical Decision Support Systems for ICU Triage: An Agentic AI Framework for Real-Time, Explainable Critical Care Decision-Making

Authors

  • Bipin Sule
  • Parikshit N. Mahalle
  • Dattatray G Takale

Keywords:

Agentic AI, Clinical decision support, Critical care informatics, Explainable AI, ICU triage, Large language models, Multi-agent systems

Abstract

Intensive Care Unit (ICU) triage requires clinicians to synthesize heterogeneous, rapidly evolving data streams vital signs, laboratory results, medication histories, and unstructured clinical notes under severe time pressure, where errors can directly translate into preventable mortality. In ICU triage, the combination of heterogeneous, rapidly evolving data streams such as vital signs, lab results, medication history, and unstructured clinical notes must be synthesized under severe time constraints, with the potential for errors to have immediate impact on mortality. Traditional Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) use fixed, rule-based scores (such as APACHE II, SOFA) or a single monolithic Machine Learning (ML) model and are unable to change their behavior to fit the context, provide explanations for their behavior, or gracefully degrade when data is incomplete. The proposed multi-agent clinical decision support architecture for triage in an ICU describes a collection of autonomous agents specialized in monitoring vital signs, interpreting laboratory results, reasoning in the context of the patient, verifying medication safety, data integration, and explaining the process results to the human operator to obtain an overall human-interpretable assessment of the patient’s clinical severity. Based on the recent successes of LLM-based multi-agent systems in emergency and intensive care, the study presents the architecture, orchestration protocol, and evaluation methodology of the system and discusses their development within an ethical AI governance framework that highlights the importance of transparency, fairness, and accountability. This modular, auditable approach to clinical reasoning is more clinically credible and readily scalable to full autonomy in the ICU setting, and three open challenges are highlighted that need to be addressed before it can be used in the real world: latency, safety checks, and regulatory clearance.

References

J. Amann and A. Blasimme, “Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective,” BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, vol. 20, 2020.

A. B. Arrieta et al., “Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI,” Information Fusion, vol. 58, pp. 82–115, Jun. 2020.

S. Bere et al., “Predicting stroke outcomes using machine learning: Analysis of clinical and imaging data,” Proceedings of Data Analytics and Management, 2026, pp. 32–43.

Cohere Health, “What agentic AI means for health plans: Insights from Gartner® 2026 Research,” Cohere Health, Feb. 2026.

S. R. Thamma, “Agentic AI for clinical decision support: Real-time diagnosis, triage, and treatment planning,” International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 12, no. 3, May-Jun. 2025.

T. Hagendorff, “The ethics of AI ethics: An evaluation of guidelines,” Minds and Machines, vol. 30, pp. 99–120.

S. Han and W. Choi, “Development of a large language model-based multi-agent clinical decision support system for korean triage and acuity scale (ktas)-based triage and treatment planning in emergency departments,” arXiv, 2024.

A. Ibrahim, A. AlSanousi, A. Serag “TriAgent: An adaptive multi-agent architecture for crisis clinical decision support under incomplete information,” AI, vol. 7, no. 6, Jun. 2026.

M. K. Mokashi et al., “Deep learning for colorectal cancer screening using colonoscopy images,” Smart Trends for Information Technology and Computer Communications, Oct. 2025, pp. 511–522.

G. Santhakumar, D. G. Takale, S. Tyagi, R. Anitha, M. Tiwari, and J. A. Dhanraj, “Analysis of multimodality fusion of medical image segmentation employing deep learning,” in Human Cancer Diagnosis and Detection Using Exascale Computing, K. Joshi and S. K. Gupta, Eds. Feb. 2024.

S. Shrivastav et al., “Real-time hybrid AI framework for anomaly detection in GraphQL APIs under nested-query attacks,” in Next-Generation Computing and Information Systems, A. Gupta, Ed., 1st ed., 2026.

A. Sorte, S. Shirote, O. Soma, R. Solanke, S. Banchhor and D. Takale, “Smart post-surgical recovery monitoring using wearable data and mobile-based reporting,” 2025 3rd DMIHER International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare, Education and Industry (IDICAIHEI), Wardha, India, 2025, pp. 1–6.

G. Suryawanshi et al., “MediSmart: An integrated AI framework for hospital management and patient safety,” International Conference on Emerging Technologies for Multidisciplinary Innovation and Sustainability, Jan. 2026.

D. G. Takale, P. N. Mahalle, S. S. Bere, and P. P. Gawali, Eds., Applied Machine Learning in Healthcare: Case-Based Approach. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, Dec. 29, 2025.

D. G. Takale, P. N. Mahalle, and B. Sule, “Generative large language models for healthcare applications: opportunities, challenges, and future directions,” Journal of Computer Based Parallel Programming, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 25–30, 2024.

A. Tandon, A. Dhir, A. K. M. M. Islam, and M. Mäntymäki, “Blockchain in healthcare: A systematic literature review, synthesizing framework and future research agenda,” Computers in Industry, vol. 122, Nov. 2020.

Published

2026-08-08