Digital Twin Technology: An Overview of Digital Twin and Implementation Approaches for Battery Digital Twin

Authors

  • Tanisha Shinde
  • Harshad Shinde
  • Sampatrao More
  • Atharv Lolage

Keywords:

Data-driven approach, Digital twin, Physics-based approach, Remaining Useful Life (RUL), State of Charge (SOC), Technological evolution

Abstract

Digital twin technology has recently garnered significant attention across multiple industry sectors. A digital twin is a virtual representation of physical entities including individuals, devices, systems, or processes mapped from the physical world into the digital domain. This digital counterpart enables various simulations that aid in addressing real-world challenges and optimizing operations. The digital twin paradigm integrates several advanced technologies, such as machine learning, data analytics, modeling, visualization, and simulation. This study outlines two primary implementation strategies for digital twins by introducing layered frameworks to support practical deployments. A detailed survey of machine learning algorithms such as linear regression, decision trees, random forest regression, Gaussian process regression, and support vector regression is conducted to assess their effectiveness in predicting the battery’s State of Charge (SOC).

In the data-driven approach, data is the cornerstone for constructing accurate virtual models. In contrast, the physics-based approach relies on techniques like Equivalent Circuit Models (ECM) and mathematical methods, including the Kalman Filter algorithm, to mirror real-world behavior. Additionally, this paper traces the developmental history of digital twin technology, which originated in 2002. By exploring different stages of its evolution, the study outlines potential future advancements. These evolutionary insights can be leveraged to create efficient and forward-looking digital twin models aligned with emerging technological trends.

References

D. Yang et al., “A digital twin-driven life prediction method of lithium-ion batteries based on adaptive model evolution,” Materials, vol. 15, no. 9, p. 3331, Jan. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15093331

F. Tao, M. Zhang, Y. Liu, and A. Y. C. Nee, “Digital twin driven prognostics and health management for complex equipment,” CIRP Annals, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 169–172, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.055

B. R. Barricelli, E. Casiraghi, and D. Fogli, “A survey on digital twin: Definitions, characteristics, applications, and design implications,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 167653–167671, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2953499

S. Amershi et al., “Software engineering for machine learning: A case study,” 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP), May 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/icse-seip.2019.00042

P. Kollmeyer, C. Vidal, M. Naguib, and M. Skells, “LG 18650HG2 Li-ion battery data for FNN xEV SOC Estimator,” vol. 1, Feb. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.17632/cp3473x7xv.1

F. Naseri et al., “Digital twin of electric vehicle battery systems: Comprehensive review of the use cases, requirements, and platforms,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 179, p. 113280, Jun. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113280

MathWorks. “Building a cloud-based digital twin for an EV battery pack” MathWorks, Video, 2023. Available: https://www.mathworks.com/videos/building-a-cloud-based-digital-twin-for-an-ev-battery-pack-1684777184787

M Kalil. “The future of digital twins: How virtual replicas are changing industries.” Mike Kalil Blog. May 2023. Available: https://mikekalil.com/blog/digital-twin-future/

Published

2025-09-16

Issue

Section

Articles