Hierarchical Trust-based Artificial Intelligence Governance Model for Data Protection

Authors

  • Olubodun E. O
  • Alese B. K.

Keywords:

Access control, AI governance, Hierarchical trust, HTF platform, Trade secret protection, Zero trust

Abstract

The widespread adoption of artificial intelligence in organizations has introduced critical risks for trade secret protection, as AI systems may inadvertently disclose or infer sensitive information. Existing governance frameworks lack empirical validation, hierarchical trade-secret safeguards, and integration with zero-trust principles. This study presents a hierarchical trust‑based governance framework that explicitly prevents AI systems from accessing trade secrets beyond authorized organizational levels. A six-equation mathematical model quantifies trust level, access control strength, decision rights, AI usage eligibility, governance effectiveness, and knowledge advancement. The framework is implemented as the HTF Platform, a web application with two-factor authentication, real-time dashboards, and a policy decision confusion matrix. A real-world deployment with 250 audited access decisions achieved 91.6% accuracy, 94.7% precision, 91.6% recall, and 93.1% F1-score. The system architecture and operational flowchart are presented. The confusion matrix confirms that lower-tier users are correctly denied access to higher-tier trade secrets, while legitimate requests are reliably granted. The HTF Platform provides a practical, verifiable, and adaptive solution for safeguarding trade secrets in AI-driven organizations.

References

C. A. Hrdy, “AI Encyclopedia Entry: Trade Secrets Forthcoming in Elgar Concise Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence and the Law (Edward Elgar, eds. Ryan Abbott, Elizabeth Rothman, forthcoming, U.K.: Edward Elgar, 2026,” 2025.

J. P. Quintais, “Generative AI, copyright and the AI Act,” Computer Law & Security Review, vol. 56, p. 106107, Apr. 2025.

IBM, “The foundation of scalable enterprise AI: Building a Robust Framework for Data and AI Governance and Security,” 2025.

European Commission, “Governance and Enforcement of the AI Act,” Shaping Europe’s digital future. 2025.

ISO/IEC 42001:2023, "Artificial intelligence Management system.

K. Jain, A. N. Melford, S. K. N. Vankdoth, A. O. Abbas, E. Umah, and S. O. Abbas, “Governance models for safe deployment and fine-tuning of generative AI in enterprise security and data protection,” Journal of Engineering Research and Reports, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 100–115, Jan. 2026.

MassiveScale.AI, “Agentic Trust Framework (ATF),” 2025.

M. Lorenzo et al., “ARBITER: AI-driven filtering for role-based access control,” arXiv: 2512.20535, 2025.

Lee, S. AI Integrity: A New Paradigm for Verifiable AI Governance. arXiv: 2604.11065, 2026.

Kiteworks. Zero Trust AI Privacy Protection: 2025 Implementation Guide, 2025.

K. Huang et al., “AAGATE: A NIST AI RMF-aligned governance platform for agentic AI,” arXiv (Cornell University), Oct. 2025.

Lepide. Lepide Unleashes AI-Led Lepide Protect: A game-changer for permissions management and zero trust. 2025.

Published

2026-05-28

How to Cite

Olubodun E. O, & Alese B. K. (2026). Hierarchical Trust-based Artificial Intelligence Governance Model for Data Protection. Journal of Big Data Analytics and Business Intelligence, 8–19. Retrieved from https://matjournals.net/engineering/index.php/JoBDABI/article/view/3629