Determinants of Customer Repeat Purchase Behavior in Ride-sharing Services: An Empirical Study on Ride-sharing users in Dhaka City
Keywords:
Customer satisfaction, Repeat purchase behavior, Ride-sharing, Service quality, TrustAbstract
Purpose: This study investigates the determinants influencing customer repeat purchase behavior in ride-sharing services among users in Dhaka City, focusing on perceived value, service quality, trust, convenience, pricing, customer satisfaction, and perceived risk.
Methodology: A quantitative research approach was adopted. Primary data were collected from 220 ride-sharing users in Dhaka City through structured questionnaires using convenience sampling. SPSS, descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, correlation analysis, and regression analysis were used for data analysis.
Findings: The findings reveal that service quality, trust, convenience, customer satisfaction, and perceived value significantly influence customer repeat purchase behavior. Pricing also positively affects customer behavior, whereas perceived risk negatively influences repeat purchase intention.
Practical Implications: Ride-sharing companies can improve customer retention by ensuring reliable service quality, affordable pricing, user-friendly applications, and stronger safety measures.
Value: This study contributes to the literature on digital transportation services and provides insights into consumer behavior in Bangladesh’s ride-sharing industry.
Research Limitations: The study was limited to ride-sharing users in Dhaka City and used convenience sampling, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.
References
Ahmed, S., Choudhury, M. M., Ahmed, E., Chowdhury, U. Y., & Asheq, A. Al. (2020). Passenger satisfaction and loyalty for app-based ride-sharing services: through the tunnel of perceived quality and value for money. The TQM Journal, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print), 33 (6): 1411–1425.
Anderson, E., & Sullivan, M. (1993). The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms. Marketing Science, 12(2), 125- 143.
Ashrafi, D. M., Alam, I., & Anzum, M. (2021). An Empirical Investigation of Consumers’ Intention for Using Ride-Sharing Applications: Does Perceived Risk Matter? International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 18(08).
Berry, L. (1995). Relationship marketing of services. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 236-245.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Gefen, D. (2000). E-commerce: The role of familiarity and trust. Omega, 28(6), 725-737.
Hossain, M., & Islam, M. (2021). Customer satisfaction in ride-sharing services in Bangladesh. Journal of Transportation Research, 14(2), 77-92.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. (2021). Marketing Management. Pearson Education.
Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 63, 33-44.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.
Sakib, Md. N., & Mia, Md. H. (2019). The ride-sharing services in Bangladesh: Current status, prospects, and challenges.
Rahman, M., & Karim, R. (2020). Digital transportation services and urban mobility in Dhaka City. Asian Business Review, 10(1), 45-58.
Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press.
Sikder, S., Rana, Md. M., & Polas, M. R. H. (2021). Service Quality Dimensions (SERVQUAL) and Customer Satisfaction towards Motor Ride-Sharing Services: Evidence from Bangladesh. Annals of Management and Organization Research, 3(2), 97–113.
Statista. (2024). Ride-sharing market growth statistics.
Sweeney, J., & Soutar, G. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 203-220.
Zeithaml, V. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.