A Review on Seismic Behaviour of Structures with Irregularities Using Pushover Analysis
Keywords:
Extended Three-Dimensional Analysis of Building System (ETABS), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA-356), Irregularities, Performance-based design, Pushover analysis, Seismic behaviorAbstract
Earthquakes are considered one of the most destructive natural disasters, mainly resulting in the loss of lives and property. Due to physical constraints that prevent the construction of buildings and because aesthetic flaws are considered, these anomalies cause damage to buildings during earthquakes. The performance level of a building exposed to earthquakes is evaluated using a performance-based design. A few non-linear static analysis techniques have been developed to examine a building's performance. Pushover analysis is a common technique for determining a building's performance level. Based on the pushover analysis results, deciding whether collapse happens at the member or structure level is possible.
Additionally, the necessity and requirement of pushover analysis are explained. The performance of the building is assessed using the criteria specified in Federal Emergency Management Agency-356 and Applied Technology Council-40. To facilitate the modeling and analysis of seismically irregular buildings, software like ETABS and SAAP2000 are utilized.
References
F. C. Dya and A. W. C. Oretaa, “Seismic vulnerability assessment of soft story irregular buildings using pushover analysis,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 125, pp. 925–932, Jan. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.103.
G. Cremen and C. Galasso, “Earthquake early warning: Recent advances and perspectives,” Earth-Science Reviews, vol. 205, p. 103184, Jun. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103184.
"IS 1893 (Part 1): 2016 Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures part 4 industrial structures including stack-like structures," 2016. Available: https://civiltechnicalguruji.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/is-1893-4-criteria-for-earthquake-resistant-design-of-structures-part-4-industrial-structures-inc-2.pdf
K. P. Sreejaya, S. T. G. Raghukanth, I. D. Gupta, C. V. R. Murty, and D. Srinagesh, “Seismic hazard map of India and neighbouring regions,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 163, p. 107505, Dec. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107505.
Amrapali Kasabe and Vaibhav Shelar, “Pushover analysis of building using soft story at different levels,” World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 203–210, Jun. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaets.2023.9.1.0160.
Abdel Salam Hamdy Makhlouf and Mahmood Aliofkhazraei, Handbook of materials failure analysis: with case studies from the oil and gas industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2016.
R. A. Meyers, Encyclopedia of physical science and technology: yearbook. San Diego, Calif.: Academic Press,.
M. Mwafy and A. S. Elnashai, “Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings,” Engineering Structures, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 407–424, May 2001, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0141-0296(00)00068-7.
K. N. Khattri, A. M. Rogers, D. M. Perkins, and S. T. Algermissen, “A seismic hazard map of India and adjacent areas,” Tectonophysics, vol. 108, no. 1–2, pp. 93–134, Sep. 1984, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(84)90156-2.
S. Diamantopoulos, Zeinep Achmet, Sotiria Stefanidou, O. Markogiannaki, and Michalis Fragiadakis, “Fragility assessment and risk-targeted design of RC buildings considering the effect of aging,” Structures, vol. 62, pp. 106277–106277, Mar. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106277.
N. M.; Hall, “Earthquake spectra and design,” Engineering monographs on earthquake criteria, 2024. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982esd..book.....N/abstract (accessed December 04, 2024).
Kumar, R. K. Meena, R. Raj, M. I. Khan, and J. M. Khatib, “Wind Effects on Re-Entrant Wing Faces of Plus Plan-Shaped Building,” Buildings, vol. 13, no. 12, p. 3108, Dec. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13123108.
M. M. Ali and K. Al-Kodmany, “Structural Systems for Tall Buildings,” Encyclopedia, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1260–1286, Jul. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia2030085.
Ö. Çavdar and A. Bayraktar, "Pushover and non-linear time history analysis evaluation of a RC building collapsed during the Van (Turkey) earthquake on October 23, 2011," Natural Hazards, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 657–673, Sep. 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0835-3.
P. Kalkbrenner, L. Pelà, and C. Sandoval, “Multi directional pushover analysis of irregular masonry buildings without box behavior,” Engineering Structures, vol. 201, p. 109534, Dec. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109534.
Kevin Karanja Kuria and Orsolya Katalin Kegyes-Brassai, "Non-linear static analysis for seismic evaluation of existing RC hospital building," Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 21, pp. 11626–11626, Oct. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app132111626.
L. Dong and R. Lakes, “Advanced damper with high stiffness and high hysteresis damping based on negative structural stiffness,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 50, no. 14–15, pp. 2416–2423, Jul. 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.03.018.
Kyriazis Pitilakis and Springerlink (Online Service, Recent Advances in Earthquake Engineering in Europe: 16th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering-Thessaloniki 2018. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018.
Christos Giarlelis, Constantinos Repapis, Evlalia Lamprinou, G. Mylonakis, G. Manolis, and Anastasios Sextos, “Seismic performance and SSI effects of a two-storey RC school building during the 2014 Cephalonia, Greece, earthquake sequence,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 4643–4667, May 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01698-8.
R. Montuori, E. Nastri, and B. Tagliafierro, “An optimal seismic force pattern for uniform drift distribution,” Buildings, vol. 9, no. 11, p. 231, Nov. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9110231.
Atilla Ansal and Springerlink (Online service, perspectives on European earthquake engineering and seismology: Volume 1. Cham: Springer International Publishing, Imprint Springer, 2014.
“Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings,” 2000. Available: https://www.nehrp.gov/pdf/fema356.pdf
"Improvement of non-linear static seismic analysis procedures FEMA 440," 2005. Available: https://mitigation.eeri.org/wp-content/uploads/fema-440.pdf
Tharindu Abeysiriwardena, K. K. Wijesundara, and R. Nascimbene, “Seismic risk assessment of typical reinforced concrete frame school buildings in Sri Lanka,” Buildings, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 2662–2662, Oct. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13102662.
J. C. Vielma-Quintero, E. G. Diaz-Segura, and J. C. Vielma, “Influence of the plan structural symmetry on the non-linear seismic response of framed reinforced concrete buildings,” Symmetry, vol. 16, no. 3, p. 370, Mar. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16030370.
M. Heshmati, A. Khatami, and H. Shakib, “FEMA P695 methodology for safety margin evaluation of steel moment resisting frames subjected to near-field and far-field records,” SN Applied Sciences, vol. 3, no. 2, Jan. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04230-2.
M. F. Sepahvand, J. Akbari, and K. Kusunoki, “Plastic design of moment resisting frames using mechanism control,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 153, pp. 275–285, Feb. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.10.015.
Ghobarah, “Performance-based design in earthquake engineering: state of development,” Engineering Structures, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 878–884, Aug. 2001, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0141-0296(01)00036-0.
Akrivi Chatzidaki, Dimitrios Vamvatsikos, and E. Hernandez-Montes, “Performance-based versus conventional seismic design: Comparative assessment on a 4-story RC moment frame,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 3031–3053, Mar. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-024-01871-7.
K. K. Kuria and O. K. Kegyes-Brassai, “Pushover analysis in seismic engineering: A detailed chronology and review of techniques for structural assessment,” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 151, Jan. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app14010151.
H. Mohamed and X. Romao, “Seismic fragility functions for non-seismically designed RC structures considering pounding effects,” Buildings, vol. 11, no. 12, p. 665, Dec. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11120665.
L. Di Sarno, S. Amiri, and A. Garakaninezhad, “Effects of incident angles of earthquake sequences on seismic demands of structures,” Structures, vol. 28, pp. 1244–1251, Dec. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.09.064.
H. Zhang, J. Liu, K. Wang, Z. Jiang, C. Wei, and Z. Wang, “Seismic safety evaluating method for High-Rise frame structures via advanced incremental dynamics analysis,” Ain Shams Engineering Journal, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 102888–102888, Jun. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2024.102888.
G. N. Kumar, G. N. Arunkumar, N. Punith, and T. M. Prakash, “Comparative study on stiffness regular and stiffness irregular building subjected to seismic load using pushover analysis,” International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 494–499, May 2018.
M. J. Esfandiari and G. S. Urgessa, “Progressive collapse design of reinforced concrete frames using structural optimization and machine learning,” Structures, vol. 28, pp. 1252–1264, Dec. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.09.039.
H. Naderpour and M. Mirrashid, “A novel definition of damage states for structural elements in framed reinforced concrete buildings,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 32, p. 101479, Nov. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101479.
Nolaraj Poudel and Hemchandra Chaulagain, "Numerical investigation of non-linear soil-structure interaction effects on response of irregular RC buildings," Results in Engineering, vol. 22, pp. 102161–102161, Apr. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102161.
M. R. Shendkar, D. P. N. Kontoni, E. Işık, S. Mandal, P. R. Maiti, and E. Harirchian, “Influence of masonry infill on seismic design factors of reinforced-concrete buildings,” Stock and Vibration, 2022, Available: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5521162.
Rajesh, “Seismic performance study on RC wall buildings from pushover analysis,” International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, vol. 03, no. 18, pp. 165–171, May 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.15623/ijret.2014.0318027.
M. Alhassan, and J. Welch, “Incorporating very powerful structural analysis and design software packages into civil engineering courses,” in In 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, pp. 15–717.
M. R. Minhas and V. Potdar, “Decision support systems in construction: A bibliometric analysis,” Buildings, vol. 10, no. 6, p. 108, Jun. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10060108.
P. Gwalani, Y. Singh, and H. Varum, “Effect of proportioning of lateral stiffness in orthogonal directions on seismic performance of RC buildings,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 26, no. 14, pp. 7568–7586, Aug. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2021.1964649.
Comartin, R. Niewiarowski, and C. Rojahn, “ATC-40 seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings volume 1 by applied technology council 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 550 Redwood City, California 94065 Funded by SEISMIC SAFETY COMMISSION State of California Products 1.2 and 1.3 of the Proposition 122 Seismic Retrofit Practices Improvement Program PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR CO-PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR PROJECT DIRECTOR,” 1996. Available: https://www.atcouncil.org/pdfs/atc40toc.pdf
ETABS (2009), “Analysis Reference Manual”, Computers and Structures, Berkely, California, USA. ,https://www.csiamerica.com/
Pettorruso and Virginio Quaglini, "Comparison of linear and non-linear procedures for the analysis of the seismic performance of straight multi-span RC bridges," Buildings, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 464–464, Feb. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14020464.
Craciun, “Integrated building design software,” Academia.edu, Mar. 07, 2014. https://www.academia.edu/6329310/Integrated_Building_Design_Software (accessed December 04, 2024).
M. Mathews, T. V. Kishore, B.R. Jayalekshmi, and Katta Venkataramana, “Vulnerability assessment of RC buildings with irregularities using probabilistic analysis,” Materials Today Proceedings, May 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.651.
M. Inel and H. B. Ozmen, "Effects of plastic hinge properties in non-linear analysis of reinforced concrete buildings," Engineering Structures, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 1494–1502, Sep. 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.01.017.
Asikoglu, G. Vasconcelos, P. B. Lourenço, and B. Pantò, “Pushover analysis of unreinforced irregular masonry buildings: Lessons from different modeling approaches,” Engineering Structures, vol. 218, p. 110830, Sep. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110830.
Bureau of Indian Standards, “IS 1893-1 (2002): Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, Part 1: General provisions and buildings,” 2002. Available: https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/S03/is.1893.1.2002.pdf
M. V. Mohod, “Pushover analysis of structures with plan irregularity,” IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 46–55, 2015.
B. Borzi, R. Pinho, and H. Crowley, “Simplified pushover-based vulnerability analysis for large-scale assessment of RC buildings,” Engineering Structures, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 804–820, Mar. 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.021.
B. Almassri, “Seismic assessment and strengthening of a RC building using pushover analysis,” ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, vol. 18, no. 20, pp. 2273–2280, Oct. 2023, Available: https://scholar.ppu.edu/bitstream/handle/123456789/9009/jeas_1023_9332.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
N. B. Chandrashekar and S. K. Prasad , "Pushover analysis for the effect of opening on seismic behavior of infill frames," in Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Architecture and Civil Engineering (AARCV 2012), Bonfring, Jun. 2012, pp. 339–342. Available: https://conference.bonfring.org/papers/MSR_AARCV2012/SAM203.pdf
G. Ghayoumian and A. R. Emami, “A multi-direction pushover procedure for seismic response assessment of low-to-medium-rise modern reinforced concrete buildings with special dual system having torsional irregularity,” Structures, vol. 28, pp. 1077–1107, Dec. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.09.031.
Govind M, “Non-linear static pushover analysis of irregular space frame structure with and without T shaped columns,” International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, vol. 03, no. 15, pp. 663–667, May 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.15623/ijret.2014.0315123
A. E. Hassaballa, M. A. Ismaeil, A. N. Alzead, and F. M. Adam, “Pushover analysis of existing 4 storey RC flat slab building,” International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 242–257, Jul. 2014.
B. Kissi et al., “Influence of zone type on performance of retrofitted Reinforced Concrete buildings by using Pushover Analysis,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 22–29, Jan. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.048
Z. Wang, P. Martinez-Vazquez, and B. Zhao, “Pushover analysis of structures subjected to combined actions of earthquake and wind,” Engineering Structures, vol. 221, pp. 111034–111034, Oct. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111034
X.-K. Zou and C.-M. . Chan, “Optimal seismic performance-based design of reinforced concrete buildings using nonlinear pushover analysis,” Engineering Structures, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1289–1302, Jul. 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.04.001
