A Study on Comprehensive Guide on Generative AI in Personalized Education: Creating Tailored Learning Experiences
Keywords:
Adaptive education, AI in education, Generative AI, Personalized learning, Tailored learning experiencesAbstract
Generative AI can create sophisticated learning experiences with the learning needs at the forefront of the system discussed in this paper, truly opening up opportunities for personalized learning. To put this in the context of the broader ecosystem of personalized education, we move away from a one-size-fits-all approach to education by tailoring content, pace, and assessments based on different learner types. As there are no tests on generative AI models like GPT or LLaMA to show how these models can create quizzes, assignments, feedback, forms, surveys, and even adaptive learning sequences on demand with real-time performance data embedded in the response, the experiments demonstrate performances for generic generative AI-based models.
Drawing from a multitude of case studies and existing frameworks, the paper provides a holistic discussion not only about the realistic pathways for integrating the use of AI in educational systems but also the ethical, technical, and pedagogical challenges involved as well. Other research questions include how generative AI might support learning, foster student engagement, and enable inclusive pedagogy while preserving an adequate amount of human agency. A similar narrative has the potential to play out further, as AI has a dual identity in this setting – a content generator and analyser as well as an assistant to educators with additional insight into student behaviours, thereby posing potent predictive capabilities for timely interventions.
Conceptually, the paper discusses the potential for the transformation of education in low-resource settings through the use of scalable, low-cost AI-driven educational platforms, supplemented with contextual information. It highlights the essential need for robust data privacy protections and bias mitigation procedures so that policymakers and educators do not unintentionally widen already embedded educational divides through their introduction of AI. The study concludes that for generative AI to truly be realized, policymakers, educators, and tech developers need to join together to create training programs, ethical guides, and infrastructural supports. It speaks to the necessity of protecting student rights and access, and for equity.
References
P. Brusilovsky and E. Millán, “User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems,” in The Adaptive Web: Methods and Strategies of Web Personalization, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2007, pp. 3–53. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-72079-9_1
T. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. D. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell, and S. Agarwal, "Language models are few-shot learners," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901, 2020. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/hash/1457c0d6bfcb4967418bfb8ac142f64a-Abstract.html
I. J. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio, “Generative adversarial nets,” Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 27, 2014. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2014/hash/f033ed80deb0234979a61f95710dbe25-Abstract.html
A. Radford, J. Wu, R. Child, D. Luan, D. Amodei, and I. Sutskever, "Language models are unsupervised multitask learners," OpenAI Blog, vol. 1, no. 8, p. 9, Feb. 24, 2019. https://storage.prod.researchhub.com/uploads/papers/2020/06/01/language-models.pdf
O. Zawacki-Richter, V. I. Marín, M. Bond, and F. Gouverneur, “Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators?,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–27, Dec. 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1978. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
B. S. Bloom, “The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring,” Educ. Res., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 4–16, Jun. 1984. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X013006004
J. F. Pane, E. D. Steiner, M. D. Baird, and L. S. Hamilton, Continued Progress: Promising Evidence on Personalized Learning. Rand Corporation, Nov. 2015. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED571009
R. Luckin and W. Holmes, Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education. London, U.K.: Pearson, 2016. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1475756/
B. P. Woolf, Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors: Student-Centered Strategies for Revolutionizing E-Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, Jul. 28, 2010. https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780123735942/building-intelligent-interactive-tutors
M. Chassignol, A. Khoroshavin, A. Klimova, and A. Bilyatdinova, “Artificial Intelligence trends in education: a narrative overview,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 136, no. 1877-0509, pp. 16–24, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.233.
J. Roschelle, M. Feng, R. F. Murphy, and C. A. Mason, “Online mathematics homework increases student achievement,” AERA Open, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 2332858416673968, Oct. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416673968
S. A. D. Popenici and S. Kerr, “Exploring the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education,” Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–13, Nov. 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8.
W. Holmes, M. Bialik, and C. Fadel, Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign, Feb. 28, 2019. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10139722/
B. Williamson, R. Eynon, and J. Potter, "Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency," Learn. Media Technol., vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 107–114, Apr. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1761641
N. Selwyn, Should robots replace teachers?: AI and the Future of Education. Polity Press, 2019. Available: https://research.monash.edu/en/publications/should-robots-replace-teachers-ai-and-the-future-of-education
J. Buolamwini and T. Gebru, “Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification,” proceedings.mlr.press, Jan. 21, 2018. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a.html?mod=article_inline&ref=akusion-ci-shi-dai-bizinesumedeia
K. Crawford, The Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. New Haven, CT, USA: Yale Univ. Press, Apr. 2021. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1ghv45t
V. Eubanks, Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor, St. Martin's Press, 2018.
R. Binns, “Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophy,” arXiv.org, Mar. 23, 2021. http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.03586v2