Advancing Language Model Intelligence through Retrieval-Augmented Strategies
Keywords:
AI-based system, Deep learning, Information, Large Language Models (LLMs), Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)Abstract
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a groundbreaking concept that has transformed the enhancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) by addressing significant challenges such as providing inaccurate information, experiencing hallucinations, and lacking sufficient knowledge. By combining the ability to retrieve external knowledge stores and their generative modeling, RAG offers a way in which LLMs can dynamically consult and ingest pertinent knowledge based on up-to-date document sets when generating responses. It takes the best of both worlds since it leverages information retrieval techniques, yet its natural language generation with the help of deep learning, producing output, which is not only of high quality and based on real data but is also contextually specific and rich. In RAG systems, two stage pipeline is more common, with a retriever finding relevant documents upon user query, and a generator making an intelligible response using user query and the results retrieved. This architecture equips LLMs with the means to work well in areas where domain-specific information is necessary, in real-time scenarios, or with long contexts, where the pre-trained models cannot perform. In addition, RAG simplifies interpretation by ensuring that sources of content produced by AI can be traced, bringing more trust to AI-based systems. The range of applications is quite broad, covering such domains as healthcare, finance, law, and customer service, where precision and reliability are crucial. With the ongoing development of LLMs, RAG serves as a significant step towards the unification of the distinction between predetermined model parameters and the infinite number of human knowledges. Future applications include maximizing the quality of retrieval, latency reduction, augmented context fusion, and consideration of multimodal elements, with the ability to perform those functions as a key step in developing more intelligent, capable, and sensitive AI systems.
References
P. Lewis, E. Perez, A. Piktus, “Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks,” Arxiv, Apr. 12, 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.11401
K. Guu, K. Lee, Z. Tung, P. Pasupat, and M.-W. Chang, “REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Training,” Arxiv, Feb. 10, 2020. https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.08909
S. Borgeaud,A. Mensch, J. Hoffmann, T. Cai, “Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokens,” Arxiv, Feb. 07, 2022. https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.04426
G. Izacard, P. Lewis, M. Lomeli, “Atlas: Few-shot Learning with Retrieval Augmented Language Models,” Arxiv, Nov. 16, 2022. https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.03299.
Y. Zhao, B. Yu, B. Li, “Causal Document-Grounded Dialogue Pre-training,” Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 7160–7174, January 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.443.
O. Ram, Y. Levine, I. Dalmedigos, “In-Context Retrieval-Augmented Language Models,” Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Jan. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2302.00083.
J. Eisner, “Time-and-Space-Efficient Weighted Deduction,” Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 11, pp. 960–973, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00588.
W. Shi, S. Min, M. Yasunaga, M. Seo, “REPLUG: Retrieval-Augmented Black-Box Language Models,” Arxiv (Cornell University), Jan. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2301.12652.
A. Asai, S. Min, Z. Zhong, and D. Chen, “Retrieval-based Language Models and Applications,” Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 6, Jan. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.acl-tutorials.6.
Y. Gao, “Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey,” Arxiv.org, Dec. 18, 2023.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.10997#:~:text=Retrieval%2DAugmented%20Generation%20(RAG)
Z. Shi, Y. Xu, M. Fang, and L. Chen, “Self-imitation Learning for Action Generation in Text-based Games,” Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 703–726, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.50.
S. Wu, Y. Xiong, Y. Cui, H. Wu, “Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Natural Language Processing: A Survey,” ARXIV (Cornell University), Jul. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2407.13193.
F. Zhu, W. Lei, C. Wang, J. Zheng, Soujanya Poria, and T.-S. Chua, “Retrieving and Reading: A Comprehensive Survey on Open-domain Question Answering,” Arxiv (Cornell University), Jan. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2101.00774.
F. Fu, L. Zhang, Q. Wang and Zhendong Mao, “E-CORE: Emotion Correlation Enhanced Empathetic Dialogue Generation,” Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 10568–10586. Dec. 2023, https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.653
A. Mallen, A. Asai, V. Zhong, R. Das, and D. Khashabi, “When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memories,” Arxiv (Cornell University), Jan. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.546.
K. Lv, Y. Yang, T. Liu, Q. Gao, Q. Guo, and X. Qiu, “Full Parameter Fine-tuning for Large Language Models with Limited Resources,” Arxiv.org, 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.09782
