https://matjournals.net/engineering/index.php/IJSAACT/issue/feed International Journal of Structural Analysis and Advanced Construction Techniques 2026-09-07T05:10:29+00:00 MAT JOURNALS PRIVATE LIMITED pooja@matjournals.in Open Journal Systems https://matjournals.net/engineering/index.php/IJSAACT/article/view/3995 Low-Carbon Concrete in Bangladesh - A Comprehensive Review of Sustainable Materials and Practice 2026-08-11T06:35:33+00:00 Md. Nahid Hossain nahidce64.ce@aust.edu Razesh Kanti Sarkar nahidce64.ce@aust.edu Raisul Islam Shuvo nahidce64.ce@aust.edu <p><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;"><em>The construction industry contributes to a large </em></span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;"><em>amount</em></span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;"><em> of carbon dioxide (CO</em></span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;"><em><sub>2</sub></em></span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;"><em>) emissions, mostly because of the </em></span><em>widespread<span style="font-style: normal !msorm;"> use of ordinary Portland cement (OPC). Rapid urbaniz</span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">ation and infrastructure development in Bangladesh </span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">have </span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">led to the growing demand for sustainable construction materials. The review </span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">describes</span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;"> the possibility </span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">of using </span>low-carbon<span style="font-style: normal !msorm;"> concrete (LCC) as an</span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;"> alternative to conventional concrete in order to reduce the impact of </span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">conventional </span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">concrete on the environment. The study covers the concept of LCC as per ACI 323-24</span> <span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">and investigates the feasibility of using locally available materials such as </span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">F</span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">ly ash, </span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">G</span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">r</span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">ound granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS), </span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">R</span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">ice husk ash (RHA), and </span>r<span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">ecycled </span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">concrete aggregates (RCA). The </span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">effect </span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">of these materials on workability, mechanical</span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">, </span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">and durability</span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;"> properties</span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;"> is</span> <span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">examined. The advantages of LCC are emphasized</span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">,</span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;"> including reduced greenhouse gas emissions, conservation of natural resources</span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">,</span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;"> and the use of industrial and agricultural by-products. The technical, regulatory, supply </span>chain,<span style="font-style: normal !msorm;"> and market acceptance challenges to the widespread adoption of LCC are also addressed. The review suggests practical strategies and local resources available in Bangladesh that can help in the large-scale </span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">adoption of </span>LCC<span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">. The results</span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;"> sh</span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">ow that LCC can be a significant contributor to the reduction of environmental impacts of the construction industry while providing acceptable engineering performance and fostering sustainable infrastructure development.</span></em></p> 2026-08-11T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Structural Analysis and Advanced Construction Techniques https://matjournals.net/engineering/index.php/IJSAACT/article/view/4076 An Exploratory Structural Performance Index for Reinforced All-in Laterite Aggregate Concrete Beams Under Low Shear-Span-to-Depth-Ratio Loading 2026-09-07T05:10:29+00:00 Eghosasere Oluwaseyi Rowland-Lato eghosa.rowland-lato@uniport.edu.ng <p><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;"><em>All-in Laterite Aggregate Concrete (AILAC), in which both the coarse and the fine fractions are drawn from a single weathered laterite deposit, is a low-cost, locally available material for tropical regions, yet its shear behaviour has received little experimental attention. Because the shear strength, service stiffness and deformation capacity of a beam do not in general vary together, no single measured quantity ranks specimens on its own. This paper converts a small laboratory investigation of the shear behaviour of reinforced AILAC beams into an exploratory, within-sample Structural Performance Index (SPI). Four beams of 150 × 150 × 900 mm</em></span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;"><em>;</em></span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;"><em> three reinforced with 2Ø10, 2Ø12, and 2Ø16 mm tension bars (B<sub>₁</sub>-10<sub>,</sub> B<sub>₂</sub>-12, and B<sub>₃</sub>-16) and one plain beam (B<sub>₄</sub>), one specimen per condition and without web reinforcement</em></span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;"><em>, </em></span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;"><em>were tested under symmetric two-point loading. With a shear span a = 150 mm and effective depth d ≈ 100 mm, the shear-span-to-depth ratio is a/d ≈ 1.5, placing the specimens in the short-beam / arch-action regime. Surface strains measured with 60° rosette gauges were reduced, under a pre-crack linear-elastic assumption, to principal strains, principal stresses, and the maximum shear stress; mid-span deflection tracked serviceability. The measured principal stress–strain response is strongly linear and indicates an effective elastic modulus of about 14 GPa and a shear modulus of about 5.8 GPa for the mix. The index combines three normalised, non-dimensional pillars</em></span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;"><em>:</em></span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;"><em> nominal shear strength, service-load secant stiffness</em></span><em>, and ultimate deformation capacity, using a weighted geometric mean, chosen because it penalises imbalances among the<span style="font-style: normal !msorm;"> pillars. Within the unreplicated series tested, the SPI ranks the beams B<sub>₃</sub>-16 (0.93) &gt; B<sub>₁</sub>-10 (0.69) ≈ B<sub>₂</sub>-12 (0.69) &gt; B<sub>₄</sub> (0.20); the top and bottom ranks are stable across a range of weightings, while the two intermediate beams exchange places depending on the weights. Ultimate nominal shear strength increased with reinforcement ratio across the four specimens, and the principal-analysis shear stress rose with principal strain</span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">; </span><span style="font-style: normal !msorm;">an association that is expected, because the stress is computed from the strain through the assumed elastic relations, and is therefore reported as a descriptive consistency check rather than an independent result. Its ordering was consistent with the corresponding energy rankings and observed failure descriptions. The index should presently be interpreted as an exploratory within-sample decision aid; independent testing across laterite sources, reinforcement ratios, and shear-span-to-depth ratios is required before broader validation or design use.</span></em></p> 2026-09-07T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Structural Analysis and Advanced Construction Techniques