A User Priority Determination Method and A Load-Control Algorithm Based on Web Access History During Network Load
Keywords:
Load balancing, Load control, User priority, Web access history, Web serviceAbstract
Today, web services are rapidly growing and are being used by many users. This leads to network overload. To avoid overload, techniques for efficient load balancing and server clustering have been studied, and they are being widely used. While a common web service is running, it can occasionally be seen that network overload occurs due to access from many users. To avoid this occasional network overload, expanding computer resources to use normal network services results in the waste of computer resources and operational costs. User priority is determined according to the importance of web service, and there is a problem of limiting the access of low-priority users and providing stable web service to high-priority users at the time of the occasional network overload. Hence, a method was proposed to determine user priority based on web history during network overload under limited computer resources and to stabilize network services for high-priority users by blocking the access of low-priority users.
References
H. Singh and S. Kumar, "WSQ: Web server queueing algorithm for dynamic load balancing," Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 229–245, Jan. 2015.
K. Ramana and M. Ponnavaikko, "AWSQ: An approximated web server queuing algorithm for heterogeneous web server cluster," International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 2083–2093, Jun. 2019.
I. M. Ibrahim, S. Y. Ameen, H. M. Yasin, N. Omar, S. F. Kak, Z. N. Rashid, A. A. Salih, N. O. Salim, and D. M. Ahmed, "Web server performance improvement using dynamic load balancing techniques: A review," Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science, vol. 19, pp. 1–21, 2021.
M. R. Al-Sultan, S. Y. Ameen, and W. M. Abduallah, "Real time implementation of stegofirewall system," International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 498–504, Sep. 2019.
C. V. Johanna, R. V. Miguel, and C. G. Leonardo, "Static and dynamic load balancing algorithms most commonly used in different environments," in AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2994, no. 1, Art. no. 030006, Jan. 2024.
C. Ma and Y. Chi, "Evaluation test and improvement of load balancing algorithms of Nginx," IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 14311–14324, 2022.
M. Hamdani, Y. Aklouf, and H. Chaalal, "A comparative study on load balancing algorithms in cloud environment," In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CIST), 2020, pp. 1–4.
S. K. Maurya and G. Sinha, "Analysis of load balancing algorithms in the cloud computing environment: A review," Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, vol. 8, no. 11, 2021.
E. Moharamkhani, R. B. Garmaroodi, M. Darbandi, A. Selyari, S. E. Khediri, and M. Shokouhifar, "Classification of load balancing optimization algorithms in cloud computing: A survey based on methodology," Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 136, no. 4, pp. 2069–2103, Jun. 2024.
J. Zhou, U. K. Lilhore, T. Hai, S. Simaiya, D. N. Jawawi, D. M. Alsekait, S. Ahuja, C. Biamba, and M. Hamdi, "Comparative analysis of metaheuristic load balancing algorithms for efficient load balancing in cloud computing," Journal of Cloud Computing, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2023.
H. N. Le and H. C. Tran, "ITA: The improved throttled algorithm of load balancing on cloud computing," International Journal of Computer Networks & Communications, vol. 14, no. 1, 2022.
Y. Y. Raghav, V. Vyas, and H. Rani, "Load balancing using dynamic algorithms for cloud environment: A survey," Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 69, pp. 349–353, 2022.
J. G. Muchori and P. M. Mwangi, "Machine learning load balancing techniques in cloud computing: A review," International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 179–186, 2022.
S. Otten and H. Daduna, "Stability of queueing-inventory systems with customers of different priorities," Annals of Operations Research, vol. 331, no. 2, pp. 963–983, Dec. 2023.
